Page Summary
meranthi.livejournal.com - (no subject)
530nm330hz.livejournal.com - (no subject)- (Anonymous) - "Light-years"
- (Anonymous) - Re: "Light-years"
saxikath - Re: "Light-years"- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
saxikath - (no subject)
tahnan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tahnan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-03-21 02:13 pm (UTC)Never mind that parsecs are parallax-seconds, and therefore also distance. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2008-03-21 03:59 pm (UTC)"Light-years"
Date: 2008-03-21 06:22 pm (UTC)Second, I see via Orange's blog that you posted today on the "light-years" error. I also remember that error in Star Wars. Good job.
Re: "Light-years"
Date: 2008-03-21 06:23 pm (UTC)Jim Finder, NYC
Re: "Light-years"
Date: 2008-03-21 06:54 pm (UTC)Thanks for stopping by!
I'm a historian of science by training, with an emphasis in astronomy, and I edit science textbooks for a living, so the "light-year" thing jumped out at me.
As to the G&S crossword -- I don't know if I even have a copy of that anymore, and I'm not sure I'd want to share it if I did! I'm not much of a constructor to begin with, and that was a very early effort.
However, I do have a few crosswords around that I did as backstage entertainment for the casts of some G&S productions. Some clues are very specific to the particular productions, but if I can find those, I'd be happy to share them.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-21 06:56 pm (UTC)Jangler
no subject
Date: 2008-03-21 06:59 pm (UTC)That's in the dictionary?? Shame on RH2!
I mean, I'm generally descriptivist rather than prescriptivist in my dictionary leanings, but that's just plain wrong, and doesn't even make sense. I don't think that's a legitimate alternate usage, it's an error.
Blech!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-22 02:49 am (UTC)OK, look. Han's a blowhard showoff. Of course he's going to make stuff up.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-22 02:51 am (UTC)